Note: My videos on politics and English Grammar can be seen in the You Tube.
17
ABDUCTION
The New Indian Express- in its editorial on 29 January 2005- applauded the decision of the Government to disinvest 49% shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). It said that the sale of shares to the public and the workers of the enterprise should not make the Left see red.
The VSNL, a privatized PSU, filed a suit in the High Court, Bombay seeking a compensation of Re.2,560.72 crore for premature termination of its international long distance (ILD) monopoly. In this connection, it must be noted that the decision to sell the VSNL itself was an arbitrary one.
The Union Government on 31 January 2005 issued an ordinance to modify past excise rules to recover the arrears of Re.803 crore from the ITC. The ordinance did not give any room to the courts to interfere in this matter. This has the effect of negating the benefits granted to the ITC by the Supreme Court in a recent judgment.
The above decision indicates that the new Government has taken control of the system. The decision shows that the Government could annul any unfaithful action by any competent authority inclusive of the Supreme Court. This is the majesty and might of the Constitution of India.
The decision of the Government must be applauded because it indicates that there is still a way to escape from the predicament.
It is clear that two forces might have acted in the opposite direction - one force in “good faith’ and another force in “bad faith”. In this matter, the force that acted in good faith might have got the decision in its favour.
It must be noted that even if the Government had ignored the matter, none would have pursued the matter although an outsider cannot gauge the pressure inside the Indian system.
Whatever be the compulsions, the ordinance would not have come out without the permission of Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India.
If such an ordinance could be issued, Manmohan could take back the VSNL and the IPCL as well!
Manmohan also could come forward to set hedges to prevent flight of capital from various states!
He could reserve the seats in the IITs for various states!
He could impose transaction charge also!
On the contrary, if the ordinance were due to the efforts of a small body of committed leaders, they would have to continue their good service to the Nation.
It must be noted that this writer had pointed out the nature of the judgment to His Excellency the President of India.
However, whether the ITC paid the amount or not was not known until 2011.
On the same day - 31 January 2005 - the Union Government granted permission to the Jet Airways and the Air Sahara to start operating on India –London sector. Thus another pressure group has cemented its position in the political scene. This pressure group would remain quiet only if the Union Government asks the financial institutions to buy their shares worth Re.1/- at a price of say Re.800/-.
Naturally, these two airlines would beat all other airlines in the world with this money.
Another opportunity of private companies is that they could infuse black money like commissions with their income and show huge profits.
However, it is not to say that that the above air operators have such opportunity. No wonder that the 3 February 2005 issue of the Business Today which hit the stands on 31 January 2005 certified the Civil Aviation Minister, Mr. Praful Patel, as the best aviation minister in a decade!
In this connection, one might argue that the act of granting permission to private parties to run air services is a way to bring out the manipulated money or black money for the progress and development of the Nation. Dr.A.P.J.Abdul Kalam, His Excellency the President of India, alone knows whether it is good or bad.
However, it appears that Manmohan Singh, hereafter, would not ask the financial institutions to buy the shares of these companies, as it would be like abducting children.
Further, there are reports that the Union Government granted permission to invest 5 per cent of the Provident Fund in equities. This appeared as an arbitrary decision as it would lead to flight of capital.
Foisting concepts and practices alien to the Constitution of India on the people itself is unconstitutional. The Principal reason for the misfortune of Indians is the flight of capital and as such it is a decision taken in bad faith.
The above issue of the Business Today magazine said that the bids for the privatization of Delhi and Mumbai airports were underway and the plans of Bangalore had been finalized but not signed yet. No Union Minister or any other leader has talked about this matter. Surely, the Union Ministers must be unaware of the developments.
Before the media brigands, the Union Ministers are like touring groups. The media brigands are the permanent in the changing Governments.
Thus, the industrialists working in a place in New Delhi took the decisions and it would be placed before the Union Cabinet at an appropriate time to finish the formalities. The only force that stands on their way is the letters of this writer.
Abdul Kalam gave away “Dadasaheb Phalke” award for 2003 for lifelong contribution to movies on 2 February 2005 in a function at New Delhi. He had been permitted to talk for five minutes only.
He said that someone told him that he chose cinema as his career because he believed that he could fight corrupt politicians through cinema world. He wanted all those in the film world to create good political leaders.
The words of Abdul Kalam should have sent shock waves across the system.
Manmohan Singh did not react to the words of Abdul Kalam. However, the people all over India would have guessed the meaning of his words.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the above speech of Abdul Kalam was telecast live by the public sector TV channel. The other media brigands did not publish his speech. This is their way of oppression. The aim of the media brigands is obvious.
The utterance of Abdul Kalam indicates that he is relentlessly contributing his share to eliminate manipulations subject to his limitations, and that all allegations mentioned in these letters are correct.
Further, the speech indicates that the Government is not living up to his expectations.
In this connection, it must be noted that there is no limit for the power of the President of India to curb corruption. Actually, a President- free from corruption- wields enormous influence on the system, as it is very difficult for the manipulators and media brigands to visit the Presidential Palace.
However, it is strange that mega manipulations have been resumed with great vigour to the detriment of 1000 million people.
The New Indian Express on 4 February 2005 came out with an editorial titled “Balance this equation”. It must be noted that this writer is a lecturer in chemistry, which is a subject known for equations.
On the same day, the same paper said that Chief Justice of India R.C. Lahoti was offered the post of a judge in the international Court of Justice, The Hague, with salary and perks amounting to Re.80 lakh per month, tax-free.
This is, apparently, the answer of the media brigands to the letter No.47 dated 28 January 2005.
Apparently, the media brigands believe that the present Chief Justice of India must be paid a little more for remaining in India. The article gives the impression that the present Chief Justice of India also would function as the legal adviser of the manipulators after his stint in the Supreme Court.
It must be noted that the media brigands were aware of the invitations extended to the Chief Justice of India.
19 people - inclusive of six policemen - were killed in the first phase of election to Haryana, Jharkhand and Bihar. A landmine blasted by Naxalites killed the policemen.
A three judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Y.K. Sabharwal, Justice D.M.Dharmadhikari and Justice Tarun Chatterji referred a petition filed by Mr. Subramonia Swamy to quash the condition imposed on the CBI in the CVC Act 2003 - to seek prior permission of the Government to proceed against anyone above the rank of Joint Secretary - to a larger Bench.
Actually, corruption in India takes place in the Prime Minister or Union Cabinet Minister level. It is not to say that Manmohan Singh receives any money from anyone directly.
Actually, the manipulators approach the Prime Minister directly or through the bureaucracy, and the Prime Minister grants huge benefits to them presumably to safeguard his position thereby damaging the interest of the whole community. Usually, it takes the form of bulk buying or advancing money from the banks.
The matter was referred to a larger Bench seemingly because Justice Y.K.Sabharwal - who is known for his unfaithful decisions on economic matters - was in the Bench.
The Department of Telecommunication (DoT) on 4 February 2005, informed the Telecom Dispute Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) that Reliance Infocom had “deceived” the nation by routing international long distance calls as local calls. It appears that the DoT acted on merits.
However, the refusal of the Government to take back the IPCL indicates that the Government is not very sincere in its approach to contain manipulations. The fact that the Government has used the word “deceived” against Reliance must be noticed. This writer used this word several times although appropriate words would appear harder.
The Economic Times on 5 January 2005 reported that the public issue of Dena Bank was oversubscribed by 12 times. The bank sold eight crore shares of Re.10/-each at a premium of Re.17/-. Thus, despite several letters, the Government sold the shares of a nationalized bank to the people of a few states and sidelined the so-called illiterate people of many other states.
In the above matter, the Union Ministers failed to control the self-interest of Manmohan Singh because a few manipulators would have got a large number of shares insidiously as in the case of the ONGC. An enquiry would reveal this.
One fine morning these manipulators would say that they were holding 49 per cent of the shares of the Dena Bank.
The decision to sell the shares of the Dena Bank was an arbitrary one. Re.27/- was also fixed arbitrarily. Surely, some manipulators must have obtained benefits worth Re. several thousand crore.
None knows whether the nationalized banks advanced money to buy the shares of the Dena Bank to favoured people or not. It is now a day very difficult to eke out such pieces of information.
Anyhow, the Government showed to the world that it was not keen to ensure the welfare of 1000 million people.
In this connection, if the shares had been split equitably among all states, Assam would have got, say, 30 lakh shares. The Government of Assam could have kept the shares for itself or it could have reserved the shares among its various districts to be sold to the people subject to a ceiling. The burden of the Union Government also would have decreased tremendously.
In this way, the Government could have contributed greatly to equality and unity.
This would have enabled everyone in India to envisage each state in India as another Thailand, Japan or Korea.
However, the way in which the shares were actually sold showed that the Government had a purely abstract code to sell the shares. It is not clear whether Abdul Kalam could understand this abstract code or not.
It is not to say that the various Articles of the Constitution of India should always influence all actions of the Union Government. It is only to say that the Union Government should not undermine equality and unity for cornering national assets or to create a few multimillionaires.
It is also only to say that the President of India shall not facilitate this kind of unconstitutional manipulations because the Constitution envisages that the system under him must be free from such manipulations.
Now, the Union Government is utilizing the army and paramilitary forces just to plunder national assets like this.
In fact, the Government is selling the shares by force and ruling the Nation by force.
It is not for the individual conscience to declare what actions are in the National interests and Constitutional.
The Government must always see that the Constitution, the will and the moral conscience of the community are not offended by its decisions.
The act of selling the shares of the Dena Bank did not benefit the people of Assam in any way.
Thus the Government has hoodwinked the people in naked self-interest, as the good of others is not realized.
It is the paramount duty of the President of India to see that the Union Government does not destabilize the unity of the Nation through the translation of public assets into private assets. By doing so, the President of India is not obeying any individual but the Constitution “to remove the obstacles which prevent men becoming moral”.
Mr. Shekhar Gupta, in a centre page article in The New Indian Express on 5 January 2005 said that privatization as the remedy for all the ills of the Nation. He said that there was practically no opposition or protest across the political system for the increase in the FDI limit in the telecom sector and for the permission granted to private parties to fly overseas.
On the next day, one Miss. Sushila Ravindranath- in a big article in the same newspaper- ascribed the progress and development of the Nation to privatization and the creation of several Multi National Corporations (MNCs).
In this connection, it must be noted that the telephone companies are tapping even private conversations jeopardizing all legally permitted privacies. This writer has reasons to believe that private companies are tapping his conversations although these things could not be proved.
Thus, whether the FDI would be a threat to the security of India or not, it would be a threat to the safety and security of individuals so long as the telecom sector remains in private hands.
Thus the Government is abdicating its responsibility of protecting the life and security of the people.
Further, there is theory that there exists no money for the large-scale development of India. This cannot be believed because the Government did not tap the resources cited by this writer.
Furthermore, it must be noted that the Union Government is reluctant to hand over telecom sector to the state governments.
The CBI on 5 February 2005, arrested former Director General of Indian Metrological Department, Mr.S.K.Srivastava, for possessing wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income.
Earlier in this month, the CBI had raided many houses all over India in the name of unearthing black money.
There were reports that the CBI could seize about Re. two crore. The CBI, if it wants, could seize assets worth Re. several thousand crore from four or five big manipulators alone is another matter.
On 7 February 2005, a Mr. Swaminathan -in an article in The Hindu- said that the Budget would be presented on 28 February 2005 as if the entire population consists of conmen, fraudsters and cheats. The words of Green present in the first para of the letter No. 47 dated 28-1-2005 might have prompted him to write like this.
The Economic Times on 8 February 2005 reported that Jet Airways would come out with a public issue to mobilize Re. 7,700 crore.
The decision to come out with a public issue might have been taken by the Jet Airways. However, it might have reached an understanding with Manmohan Singh even before the election.
Naturally, Manmohan Singh, unless otherwise prevented, would ask the Public Sector Banks and the LIC to advance money to buy the shares of the above company.
This would be like sucking the lifeblood of Indians.
This would lead to economic deprivation of 1000 million people.
This would undermine the Constitution of India.
This would breed militancy.
The army would kill people to contain it.
It is a crime against 1000 million people.
It is a betrayal of the mandate and the Nation.
Thus the Government deprives people of their money by force and controls them by force.
It is the paramount duty of the President, Judiciary, Human Rights Commission, Vigilance agencies and investigation agencies to restrain the financial institutions from releasing pubic money to buy the shares of the Jet Airways or any other company “above its net asset value” under any principle to uphold the Constitution of India.
This is not to say that the people must be forbidden from buying shares using their hard earned money at all.
The Union Cabinet on 9 February 2005 mandated the petroleum ministry to negotiate with Pakistan, Iran, Bangladesh and Myanmar for constructing cross-country gas pipeline. The decision, even if the advantages were shared between India and Pakistan in the ratio 1:1, would do huge benefit to Pakistan. A rich Pakistan would lead to the migration of people from India to Pakistan for jobs. Similarly, a rich Bangladesh might weaken the foreign national issue in Assam.
The dreaded gangster Vicky Thakur, prime accused in the kidnapping of the student Kisly Gupta, which sparked off public outrage was killed in an encounter with the police at Patna on 9 January 2005.
It must be noted that those who are not intelligent enough to abduct money from the banking system, indulge in kidnapping children.
Manmohan Singh, on 11 February 2005, described law and order as a state subject.
On the same day- talking to media persons at Bangalore - he said that Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore were the political, financial and information technology capitals respectively of India.
On 12 February 2005, Manmohan Singh said that there was no threat to the stability of his Government. Apparently, the system is not tolerating mega manipulations and that the Union Ministers refuse to stand by the Prime Minister.
On the same day, Manmohan Singh ascribed corruption to over-regulation.
In this connection, it must be noted that petrol pumps were distributed through over 700 Members of Parliament (MPs). Today, the same are being distributed through a handful of people. They simply abduct money for granting petrol pumps. Can anyone believe that Manmohan Singh does not know this? Is this the meaning of deregulation?
Again on the same day, Manmohan Singh said that no political party in India was free from black money. The Hindu reported it on 13 February 2005.
The above words are reminiscent of the words of Justice Baruach, former Chief Justice of India, who after receiving the first few letters from this writer said that 20 per cent of the learned judges were corrupt. He covered up his guilt through that statement.
Today, Manmohan Singh is covering up his guilt by saying that all political leaders receive black money.
The people would think that Manmohan Singh alone is immaculate and virtuous as he had been a teacher and bureaucrat, and not a pure politician.
In fact, all those who have not seen these letters would think that all political leaders in India minus Manmohan Singh are corrupt as they constantly receive black money.
The disclosure of Manmohan Singh shows that he is fighting tooth and nail for his survival.
It is clear that Manmohan Singh belittles the dignity of the political leaders to boost his own image.
In this connection, it may be pointed out that black money holders knock at the doors of all political parties during election time as if they were the sympathizers of their party.
However, the crucial question is whether the political leaders see reason and change the society or not. Surely, they see reason and bring social and economic change. Thus:
1. Mr. Vajpayee, former Prime Minister of India, imposed service charges.
2. The interest rates lowered and loans rescheduled.
3. Hundreds of decisions on privatization reversed and several PSUs saved.
4. The leaders ignored the dictates of the black money holders during the recent Presidential election
5. The former Chief Justice of India was prevented from hearing the BPCL-HPCL appeal case.
6. The present Government has started several peace moves, and abandoned a few privatization moves.
The list goes endlessly.
However, a quintessence is Vajpayee.
Thus, after the VSNL episode, he did not oblige any large-scale manipulations.
Surely, a few manipulations did take place to his discomfiture because a leader of the media brigands tormented him incessantly.
However, this writer could discern that he understood the meaning of every letter sent to the President of India and, based on the letters, made several corrections in his approach to the problems before him.
The banks apparently refused to advance money for giant manipulations mainly because of his instructions. Otherwise, TCS would have come out with the public issue during his tenure.
Further, usually, the Prime Ministers do not rescind Cabinet decisions even if the political parties and the people launch hundreds of agitations. However, he ignored several decisions of the Union Cabinet on privatization because of these letters.
The Business Line on 14 February 2005 reported that the Tata group won the bid to acquire 26 percent stake in South Africa’s Second Network operator (SNO). On 17 February 2005 the same paper reported that that Tata bought Singapore’s Natsteel Ltd for $ 364.8 million. As said earlier, Tata is subjugating the world! Those who keep the shares of Tata would definitely welcome it. In fact, everyone could welcome it.
However, with which money Tata is buying the assets abroad? Is this the money mobilized through the public issue of the TCS? Does Manmohan Singh misuse his official position to siphon off money from the Indian Banks to other countries?
The action of Manmohan Singh would not result in the realization of the dream of all others. Thus, he has offended the Constitution and the community at large.
It is an offence. This writer is not free to use the appropriate word for this. This is not to say that Tata should not take the money of his shareholders, who spent money from their pocket. This is only to say that public money should not have been advanced to buy the shares.
Further, the Constitution does not permit the Government to buy shares above its net asset value because buying anything over that value would be arbitrary.
The Union Minister for Rural Development, Mr. Gulam Nabi Azad on 16 February 2005 said that there was no threat to the stability of the Union Government.
Mr. P. Chithambaram, Home Minister, on the same day said that he was prepared to talk to any militant groups to solve their problem.
He, further, said that a new Commission would examine the Centre –State relations and devolution of powers.
In this connection, it must be noted that many problems in India would disappear if everybody renounced the ambition to usurp the “assets and seats” of others. If the banks were directed to seek the permission of the Chief Ministers before removing money from various States, a new Nation would emerge. A simple notification alone is sufficient.
The body of a 16-year schoolboy was found on a field near Hoshiarpur (Punjab) on 15 February 2005, a day after kidnappers abducted him. Parents alone know the pain. Manmohan Singh considers this as a state problem.
However, prosperity or otherwise of the state is determined by the Union Government.
It must be noted that those who do not know manipulations alone abduct children. If there were some people to teach the technique to abduct money from the banks, abduction of children might cease.
This is not to say that all killings would cease the moment the manipulations cease. This is only to say that those intelligent people who abduct money from the banks are committing a similar crime.
India and Pakistan on 16 signed an agreement at Islamabad to allow travel across the Line of Control (LoC) by bus between Srinagar, and Muzaffarabad from April 7 by adopting an entry permit system for bonafide citizens. This is a momentous experimental decision whatever be the consequences.
The Government might have done this even without the letters from this writer. However, none would deny that the letter no 41 onwards particularly the point No.7 in letter No. 44 dated 20-11-2004 changed the perception of the Government towards the peace talks. The letter transformed the foe into friend. Naturally, it prompted a former Finance Minister to question the necessity of fencing the border. Thus, this day must be one of the happiest days of this writer. Thus, the Nobel Peace Prize cannot be far away from this writer. Many would have come forward to nominate this writer, if the media brigands had published the letters or at least informed the existence of these letters is another matter.
A bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice N.Santosh Hegde, Justice P.K.Balasubramonium and Justice Tarun Chatterjee expressed their inability to hear a petition filed by the dismissed Goa Chief Minister on the ground that the Chief Justice was on leave. They said that it was the procedural rule that the cases involving the VIPs would be heard only by the Chief Justice.
In this connection it must be noted that the President of India might have forwarded the copies of the letters of this writer to the learned judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
The editorial of The New Indian Express on 17 February 2005 deplored the inability of the Group of Ministers, which met on 14 February 2005, to privatize the Mumbai and Delhi airports.
Earlier, The Business Line on 3 February 2005 informed that a decision for the privatization of these airports would be over by this month.
Obviously, a body of Union Ministers succeeded in controlling the self-interest of Manmohan Singh citing, perhaps, the Constitution of India. No wonder that the forces supporting him are bound to weaken further. The latter developments disproved this conclusion.
However, The Business Line on the same day said that the Government would trim holding in all public sector banks to 51%.
In this connection, it must be stated that these shares will go into the hands of some manipulators as in the case of the shares of the ONGC. Some banks would sell shares and some others would advance money to buy the shares. The CBI and the CVC could watch if they want. No wonder, that the wealth of the manipulators is not a function of their industry and hard work but a function of the deposits in the banks.
A son would give money to his father only up to his marriage. But most of the savings of 1000 million Indians go into the hands of about a hundred manipulators! While all the rest are asked to take loan from banks, Manmohan Singh is broad minded enough to give money to a few in the name buying shares! That too to translate into assets abroad at a time of tsunami!
Due to these disquieting developments the letter No.48 was sent on 18 February 2005 through email to His Excellency the President of India extending a copy each to the CBI, CVC and the NHRC.
From
V.SABARIMUTHU
Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu 629167
To
His Excellency the President of India
Presidential Palace
New Delhi
Your Excellency
Kindly consider how the manipulators suck the lifeblood of 1000 million people by force and control them by force.
1. An industrialist in India had abducted Re. 845 crore from Bank of India to buy the VSNL. Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, former Prime Minister of India, was disturbed by this allegation and he took several remedial measures. When the people raise the opposition party to the status of the ruling party, its principal function is to undo the harm done to the community by its predecessor. However, the new Government is unable to do even one tenth of what the preceding Government could do after the VSNL episode. It is clear that the transformation of the VSNL, a PSU, into private entity took place not because the NDA was in power or because of the policy of buying and selling but because the industrialists forced the Government of India with the help of the media brigands to sign the dotted lines. This is presumably the reason why the media brigands are keeping the entire operation as a tight secret. Thus, they are sucking the lifeblood of 1000 million Indians by force and controlling them by brute force. For every bullet of the army and paramilitary forces, an industrialist in India apparently gets a huge amount through simple manipulations.
2. The IPCL too was abducted by mere force because a simple three-point rule devised for the privatization was not followed. The abduction gives pain to all right thinking people as it offends the Constitution. It must be regained. Even Bentham (1748-1832) says that it is always bad to produce more pain than pleasure.
3. The matter regarding the so-called “cash rich enterprises” too is not connected with this Government directly. Apparently, money was abducted from the cash rich enterprises after conferring autonomous and Navarethna status to them. In this matter, Mr. P. Chithambaram, Finance Minister of India, must be above suspicion. To leave not the shadow of doubt and to prove that the new system does not want to protect the abductors of public property, answers could be given to the four unanswered questions in the letter No. 32.
4. The petrol pump case indirectly enabled a new Member of Parliament – Anil Ambani - to distribute 5000 petrol outlets on his own! In other words, the Government - in the name of deregulation - faithlessly regulated petrol distribution through a few hands. The Government shall not use the judgment of the Supreme Court for a bad action as it could be construed as contempt of court. Even the simple rules that existed before the judgment have vanished! All right thinking people consider this as a crime equivalent to abduction of the Constitution as it leads to abduction of money from all over India by mere force. It must be noted that the Constitution of India was enacted not only for the past or present but also for all future times.
5. The President of India might have noticed that the CBI in this month raided the houses of over hundred people all over India and got disproportionate assets worth Re. 2 crore! The list included a police official. In this connection it must be noted that the CBI on 21 December 2001 arrested a person for removing $ 29 million from Bank of India in foreign exchange and nothing is heard about it afterwards. The CBI could have at least revealed the technique of removing foreign exchange from nationalized banks so that the youth would think of abducting money from the banks rather than abducting children. Alternatively, they would think of opposing the policy of amalgamation of PSUs and the cunning ways to abduct money from the banks.
6. Everyone in India wants to “become rich or perish”. In this situation, the Prime Minister of India must be a neutral umpire. Manmohan Singh, however, allowed the abduction of Re. 5000 crore from the nationalized banks for buying shares of the TCS without following any rule. If the NDA Government had succeeded in privatizing the banks, he would not have got this chance to give this huge amount. Now, these shares could be sold for Re. 7500 crore due to willful boosting of share prices. Thus, some intelligent people have apparently gained Re. 2500 crore without burning a drop of midnight oil or paying any tax! The collected money is being quickly translated into assets abroad. Obviously, the public deposits in the banks are utilized not for the development of the infrastructure or to remove the physical and mental malnutrition of Indians. Naturally, some of those who do not know these manipulations join militant groups. Some indulge in breaking houses. Some snatch chains and some abduct children. Thus, who is the actual abductor of children? All right thinking people would tell the President that Manmohan Singh - with help of the media brigands - has done “about as much harm as it is possible for an individual Indian to do”.
7. The banks are a sacred institution. However, it is the root of all evils in India. The people all over India perish or flourish by availing themselves of loan from the banks. This must be the rule for all. However, a few entrepreneurs, say about 100, are permitted to manipulate a huge amount undermining rule of law and equality. They come forward to sell five or ten percent of the shares of their company. Manmohan Singh asks the banks to give Re. 800 for a share of Re. 1! Next day, some men unknown to the people decide to sell the shares of a Public Sector Bank. Manmohan Singh asks the banks to advance money to some intelligent people to buy the shares for say Re.27. One Public Sector Bank sells its shares and another bank viciously advances money! Will such manipulations enhance the dignity of the Prime Minister of India? Is this the way to make India rich? All right thinking people consider this as an abduction of money by force.
8. Manmohan Singh would again silently ask the banks to buy or advance money to buy the shares of several companies. All right thinking people feel that competent authorities must prevent it. This is to prevent plunder and pillage. This is for a healthy Stock Market. The share prices must be a function of the ability and enthusiasm of the people to invest in shares. It shall not be a function of the deposits in the banks. To make sure that the funds from the banks are not abducted, Government could direct the financial institutions to seek the permission of the State Governments for removing any money from any State for any purpose. This step would create a new India. The fact that the State Governments and the political parties are long asleep shall not be an excuse to remove money from various states inhumanly. This is the reason why the changes in history are often sudden.
9. Manmohan Singh has a Supreme Duty to see that the office of the Prime Minister is not destabilized by corruption charges. It is his duty to see that his actions realize the good of others. It must be noted that abduction of any money from any bank is naked act of corruption and the Prime Minister himself is bound by oath to remain under law. A Prime Minister, who facilitates manipulations, cannot remain in power by belittling the political leaders.
10. This is letter No.48. Carlyle says, “ that one man should die ignorant who has the capacity of knowledge, that I call a tragedy, though it should happen, as by some computations it does, a thousand times a minute”. The Government must intervene to prevent that tragedy. It must ensure that everyone should be qualified to contribute something to the common good. The state can do everything, which will help, but it must do nothing, which will hinder the free development of moral personality. Its office is to make people good and to promote morality by maintaining conditions of life in which morality shall be possible. The concealment of these letters confirms that the media brigands still control the Government and the 1000 million people by mere force. Is it not worse than abduction of children?
Vellicode Yours faithfully
18-2-2005.
(V.SABARIMUTHU)
